1 |
Beyond the edge: Markerless pose estimation of speech articulators from ultrasound and camera images using DeepLabCut
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
2 |
The impact of real-time articulatory information on phonetic transcription : ultrasound-aided transcription in cleft lip and palate speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
The impact of real-time articulatory information on phonetic transcription: Ultrasound-aided transcription in cleft lip and palate speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
4 |
Enabling new articulatory gestures in children with persistent speech sound disorders using ultrasound visual biofeedback
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
UltraSuite: A Repository of Ultrasound and Acoustic Data from Child Speech Therapy Sessions
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
6 |
Covert contrast and covert errors in persistent velar fronting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Covert contrast and covert error in persistent velar fronting
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Helping children learn non-native articulations: The implications for ultrasound-based clinical intervention
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
An increasing number of studies are examining the effectiveness of ultrasound as a visual biofeedback device for speech production training or therapy. However, no randomised control trials exist. We compared the success of typically-developing children learning new articulations with and without ultrasound biofeedback. Thirty children aged 6-12 were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Group U were taught novel (non-English) consonants and vowels using ultrasound in addition to imitation, modelling, articulatory descriptions and feedback on performance. Group A were taught the same speech sounds, using the same methods but in the absence of ultrasound visual biofeedback. Results showed that both groups of children improved in their production of the novel sounds with the exception of the high back vowels [u,]. No advantage for Group U was found, except for the palatal stop [c]. ; https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs/icphs2015 ; casl ; pub ; 3962 ; pub ; 698
|
|
Keyword:
Second Language Learning; Speech Sound Disorders; Ultrasound; Visual Biofeedback
|
|
URL: https://eresearch.qmu.ac.uk/handle/20.500.12289/3962 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12289/3962 https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0698.pdf
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
10 |
Towards a 3D Tongue model for parameterising ultrasound data
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Using ultrasound visual biofeedback to treat persistent primary speech sound disorders
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
Recording speech articulation in dialogue: Evaluating a synchronized double Electromagnetic Articulography setup
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Comparing articulatory images: An MRI / Ultrasound Tongue Image database
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
Head-Probe stabilisation in ultrasound tongue imaging using a headset to permit natural head movement.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
High-speed Cineloop Ultrasound vs. Video Ultrasound Tongue Imaging: Comparison of Front and Back Lingual Gesture Location and Relative Timing.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Protocol for Restricting Head Movement when Recording Ultrasound Images of Speech
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|